moving from this

pensions
financing
elitism

energy
changing
climate

education
failing
society

us
vs.
them

to this

pensions
financing
prosperity

energy
supporting
climate

education
strengthening
society

people
standing
together

Big problems. Bold solutions.

discovering a catalytic connection
where we have been taught to believe there is no connection

completing the incomplete design

of our pensions investing system

unlocking the locked-up power of pensions

to invest in enterprise cash flows, directly

to generate adequate fiduciary cash flows, forever

it takes a little doing

also, it’s worth the effort

an incompleteness of design problem

defaulting to securities trading

rewriting the laws of fiduciary prudence

financing a new elitism

trading is fit for the purposes of individuals

negotiation is fit for the purposes of pensions

fitting investment to enterprise

NOT

distorting
enterprise to fit investment

financing a new prosperity of change, and evolutionary adaptation to life’s constant changes

Our 18 Point Manifesto

 for unlocking the power of pensions

  1. We designed pensions to aggregate surpluses in small increments from individuals to form huge actuarial risk pools that use the Laws of Large Numbers (i.e. statistics) to socialize the costs of living in retirement across statistically significant populations of statistically similar individuals.
  2. We designed these risk pools to remain full and flowing, forever, by balancing
    • inflows from two sources
      1. worker earnings
      2. investment earnings
    • outflows to two purposes
      1. plan expenses
      2. pensions paid out
  3. We HAVE NOT YET DESIGNED a properly fit-for-purpose way for pensions to generate the investment earnings that we have designed them to generate.
  4. Instead, we have defaulted to the Wall Street system of speculation on future valuation through trading in securities.
  5. This was not our first choice. In fact, just 40 years ago, almost everything our pensions are doing today was against the law.
  6. That law is the law of fiduciary duty. It requires persons entrusted with discretionary authority over other people’s money to exercise prudence in the choices they make with that money.
  7. For hundreds of years, the common law of fiduciary duty held that speculation by fiduciaries with other people’s money entrusted to their good judgement was a violation fiduciary prudence, and therefor against the law.  Trading in stocks, bonds and other securities is by definition, speculation (look it up; it’s in the dictionary). So trading in securities by pensions as fiduciaries was against the law.
  8. In 1972, a committee of lawyers decided to overrule the dictionary – and hundreds of years of common law and common sense – and write a model law intended to become a uniform state law – the Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act – that declares as a matter of legislative fiat that if it is reasonable for individuals to use portfolio diversification to manage speculative risk when trading in securities with their own money, for their own account, then is it also reasonable – and therefor within the bounds of prudence – for fiduciaries to trade in securities with other people’s money if they do so through a proper program of portfolio diversification.
  9. After a slow start, vast sums of pension money began pouring into the Wall Street system, and a whole new profession of Asset Managers has grown up to provide professional portfolio management of this pension money. So much so, that a new professional elite now dominates the trading markets. This might sound like a good thing, until one considers that the Wall Street system is actually designed for the masses; not for the elites.
  10. While the movement of pension funds into the trading markets has clearly been a boon for the elites, it is a lot less clear whether pension-funded elites taking over the trading markets has been good for the rest of us.  Since the 1970s, we have lived through the collapse of the Savings & Loan industry, the collapse of the dot.com bubble, the collapse of Long Term Capital Management and the somewhat euphemistically named Global Financial Crisis of 2008, which very nearly brought about the collapse of civilization as we know it. Over this same period, we see evolving patterns of wealth concentration that many interpret as a devolution towards elitism in society and the economy, more generally.
  11. There is another way that pensions can invest in the economy, to generate the cash inflows they need to keep their risk pools properly full and flowing, without driving our economy towards a new elitism. Pensions can negotiate. They do not have to speculate.
  12. As individuals, we cannot negotiate. Our best choice is to speculate.
    • Our savings available for investment are small, relative to the capital needs of commercial enterprise operating at mass market scale.
    • Our purpose for investing is opportunistic.
    • We are indiosyncractic in the nature and timing of our own individual life events.
  13. As participants in a pension pool, we are not so limited. And remember, as taxpayers, we all participate in the pension system, even if we are not, individually, a current or future retiree in any single, specific plan.
    • Through the pension pool, we already aggregate vast sums of individual surpluses that are, some individually, and all taken together as a group, as large or larger than almost any commercial enterprise operating at even the most massive of mass market scale.
    • As a pension pool, the pool fiduciaries who have the authority and the responsibility to act in our best interests have a very specific purpose for which they are investing, which is to generate adequate fiduciary cash inflows as required to keep their pension pool properly full and flowing, forever.
    • Also, as a pension pool that just keeps going, always being invested to always be generating adequate cash flows, forever, commitments for financing can be constructed that match the needs and the opportunities of the enterprise being financed.
  14. This is something that is UNIQUE TO PENSIONS, and a uniquely powerful feature of the design of an investing system that is purpose-built to fit the powers and purposes of pensions as perpetual investors. The investment can be tailored to fit the needs of the enteprise. THE ENTERPRISE DOES NOT HAVE TO BEND AND TWIST TO FIT THE NEEDS OF THE INVESTMENT.
  15. This is not possible in the Wall Street system. In that system, the enterprise has to grow its future value, because growth in future value is what lets the trading markets deliver on their promise of instant liquidity, on demand.
  16. This brings to top-of-mind a fundamental truth about enterprise and the economy that gets buried inside the growth mythology of the Wall Street system. Times change, and people adapt to changing times. We adapt by evolving new technologies – understood in the orginal Greek meaning of the word, as “practical knowledge of how the world about us works, and how we can change that world to make it work more a way we choose it to” – that give us new choices. And we organize new enterprises through which we evolve those new technologies for making prosperous adaptations to life’s constant changes. Enterprise and the economy are really about change, and evolutionary adaptation to change.
  17. Every enterprise starts out small and unpopular, grows in popularity for a time, continues strong as choice that remains popular for some time and eventually fades away, as times change, and people make new and different choices in adaptation to those changes.
  18. Pensions have the power to construct investments that ride the life cycle of enterprise and technology that is the real pulse beat of prosperity, investing in enterprise cash flows, directly, to generate adequate fiduciary cash flows, forever – not from a single investment in a single enterprise that is designed to never end, but through an open-endedly evolving historical timeline of investments in different technologies being evolved through different enterprises for making prosperous adaptations to life’s constant changes, as times change, and people adapt to changing times.
If pensions can negotiate cash flows, we think they should.
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org
How can I generate adequate cash flows, forever?
Anonymous, fiduciary of a pension system, retired
No so much as “fit for purpose”. More as, “what’s available”.
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org
Pensions may be described as superfiduciaries, because they are entrusted with discretionary authority over vast sums of other people’s money, for entire populations of people that are so large, and so representative of all of society, as to make them, effectively, FIDUCIARIES FOR ALL PEOPLE and FOR ALL TIMES.
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org
By the end of 1973, just one short legislative year later, 43 states had enacted this legislation. Pretty amazing.
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org
How do we reconcile elitism with free enterprise?
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org
Remember most corporations whose shares are traded in the public markets today – and whose market capitalizations can reach staggering heights – are not really commercial enterprises, so much as they are portfolios of commercial enterprises aggregated within a single corporate ownership and control structure often for the express and limited purpose of keeping the share price of that corporation going up.
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org
If the enterprise itself cannot grow, then the corporation that is organized to own, control – and finance – that enterprise must add new enterprises to its portfolio, so that the share price of the corporation continues to grow, even though the individual enterprises held inside that corporation may themselves be staying strong, or maybe even beginning to fade.
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org
This kind of what may be called “corporate gigantism” is one of the distortions we see being caused in the economy by pension participation in the Wall Street system that is driving that system into dysfunction.
Tim MacDonald, co-founder, evergreencore.org

the practical wisdom of superfiduciary stewardship
of actuarial risk pools and endowments for social benefit

investing in enterprise cash flows, directly
to generate adequate superfiduciary cash flows, forever

constantly weaving an open-endedly evolving historical timeline of investments
in different technologies being evolved through different enterprises
for making prosperous adaptations to life’s constant changes,
as times change, and people adapt to changing times

a technical solution to the technical problem
of pensions investing to generate adequate cash flows, forever

a transformational change in our understanding of the economy, enterprise, finance and prosperity

redefining “capital”

discovering “the capitalisms”

explore more in Paradigm Shifting

Is this really a proper place to invest our “safe” money?

The Wall Street system of incorporation and financialization was purposefully evolved to give individuals a chance to participate in the future growth of commercial enterprises operating at mass market scale.

Corporate shares as financialized assets traded as securities in the Wall Street system are good for individuals. They were created for the idiosyncratic life events we all encounter, as individuals.  Many people fail to realize that stocks are effectively derivatives one step removed from the operations of the enterprises they represent (a never-expiring put option that allows you to escape the investment at any time based on the market clearing price). This derivative nature was created for individuals’ needs and to let corporations go about scaling no matter who had rights to their output.

Pensions are not idiosyncratic.  Their needs are programmatic.

A pension is an actuarial risk pool.

It uses the Law of Large Numbers to socialize the costs of living in retirement across a statistically significant population of statistically similar individuals.

This risk pool is filled from two sources:

  1. worker earnings; and
  2. investment earnings.

It is drained by two purposes:

  1. paying its own costs of operation; and
  2. paying pension benefits to current retirees, currently.

The purpose of a properly functioning pension plan is to keep its inflows and outflows properly balanced, so that its risk pool remains always properly full and flowing.

This is not a future goal. It is a daily necessity, in a perpetual present…and a constant concern for those people in charge of pension fund performance.

Responsibility for pension fund performance is not the same thing as responsibility for portfolio performance.

A portfolio manager will be doing well if they do as good or better than their peers : they meet or beat the market, in each moment, from moment to moment.

A pension fiduciary will be doing well only if they are actually generating the cash inflows from their investments that their pension fund needs to keeps its risk pool properly full and flowing, today and every day, across an open-ended, ongoing and automatically self-regenerating succession of days.

When pensions participate in Wall Street, what we get is Casino Capitalism

experience is showing that pensions cannot continue with the old way of investing, pursuing growth in future value by trading in securities, and still achieve their fiduciary purpose

returns based on growth in asset trading prices look adequate, if somewhat unpredictable

however, asset prices are rising at accelerating rates

at the same time as market demographics are shifting dramatically,
from individuals to professionals

buy-and-hold

becomes

buy-low-to-sell-high

becomes

buy-high-to-sell-higher

the rich are getting richer

but nobody else is

what is the lesson to be learned here?

there is this other way

Pensions can invest in enterprise cash flows, directly
to generate adequate fiduciary cash flows, forever

directly – forever

Since they can, we think they should.

Don’t you?